Alcohol and drug testing. Laboratory methods. Scientific interpretation. Explore the evidence—and understand the limits of what a result can establish.
Australian New Year monitoring found methamphetamine dominant in wastewater but uncommon among drug-checking submissions. The apparent conflict shows why surveillance methods must be interpreted by population, place,…
A small naturalistic human study compared methylone with MDMA and measured oral-fluid concentrations. The results support recent-exposure testing but do not establish dose or impairment from a…
A toxicology review links MDMA exposure in laboratory models to ATP depletion, respiratory-chain inhibition, oxidative stress, and altered mitochondrial trafficking.
A review estimated nonfatal and fatal ecstasy risks using national monitoring data, but its assumptions show why apparent precision must be interpreted cautiously.
An emergency-department study compared 4-FA, MDMA, and amphetamine presentations and found a distinctive combination of headache and elevated blood pressure.
Controlled dosing in 12 volunteers found approximately dose-proportional methylone exposure from 50 to 200 mg, unlike MDMA’s previously described nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
Okorie Okorocha, J.D., M.S., M.S. brings legal training and graduate education in forensic science and forensic toxicology to the interpretation of complex evidence.
This library connects analytical methods, specimen quality, and pharmacology with the questions that matter in a scientific review.